Press Release: Ginnie Stress Test Inappropriate for Smaller Lenders, Cautions CHLA

  • by

CHLA TO GINNIE MAE:  STRESS TESTING IS NOT

APPROPRIATE OR NECESSARY FOR SMALLER ISSUERS

[CHLA Comment Letter on Ginnie Mae Stress Testing Follows January Ginnie Mae Report]

The Community Home Lenders Association (CHLA) today submitted its comment letter
in response to Ginnie Mae’s Request for Input (RFI) on its “Stress Testing Framework and
Recommendations.”

CHLA’s comment letter made three major recommendations:

1.  Stress testing should not be used for smaller Ginnie Mae issuers as it would not
accurately assess smaller issuer risk, would undermine Ginnie Mae’s access to credit
duties, and would increase issuer concentration.

2.  If applied in any capacity to any smaller issuers, stress testing should: (1) be fully
transparent, (2) not impose an undue regulatory compliance burden on smaller
issuers, (3) be fully beta tested for smaller issuer impact and negative bias before being applied to any smaller issuers, and not supercede qualitative reviews or liquidity or net worth ratios that have historically been used to supervise smaller
issuers.

3.   Ginnie Mae should proactively communicate with warehouse lenders about
whether and how it intends to apply stress testing to smaller issuers – in order to
avoid warehouse lenders reducing credit to smaller issuers merely out of fear or
lack of knowledge of any changes that Ginnie Mae might be considering.

CHLA’s letter referenced and prominently quoted from CHLA’s January 2019 “Report on
Ginnie Mae” which highlighted Ginnie Mae’s statutory access to credit responsibilities and its
strong historical financial performance – in order to argue that Ginnie Mae should not engage in
supervisory tightening of smaller issuers that would shrink its issuer base, leading to increased
issuer concentration, to the detriment of the program.

The CHLA comment letter pointed out that stress testing has historically been used for
only an industry’s largest entities, pointing out in detail both why it would not be appropriate to
use stress testing for smaller issuers and why it is not necessary to do so to sufficiently
supervise them.

CHLA noted in their letter that it is not opposed to the general concept of stress testing,
noting that it supports stress testing for Ginnie Mae’s largest issuers (consistent with the types
of entities stress testing usually applies to) – and stating that CHLA”encourages every IMB to
make efforts to identify, analyze, and develop contingency plans in order to be prepared for
potential adverse developments. . . ”

However, CHLA’s letter laid out extensive arguments why formal stress testing is not
appropriate for smaller issuers.  The letter also cautioned that any use of stress testing in any
context for smaller issuers:

* Should be Transparent and Understandable
* Should Not Impose New Compliance Costs and Burdens on Small Issuers, and
* Must be Fully Beta Tested Before Any use with Small Issuers

The letter concluded by noting that “. . . it is critical that Ginnie Mae proactively
communicate their plans with the warehouse lending community regarding any stress testing
impact on smaller lenders” – pointing out that failure to adequately do so could result in
warehouse lenders contracting lending to smaller IMBs out of fear or lack of knowledge, which
could by itself create risk for Ginnie Mae.